Monday, April 2, 2012

 
Blog Entry 5                    "You're Fired!"


         
       For my final entry, I wanted to do a little twist on the theme I have for blog on discipline in the education system by focusing on how teachers are disciplined for their conduct outside of school and whether or not there is validation to these punishments. In class we watched a YouTube video about a teacher who was fired for posted hateful comments about homosexuality to his Facebook page and I found it extremely interesting and I wanted to investigate more cases of teachers being punished, perhaps even fired, for the way they conduct themselves outside of the classroom. An opinion article in the Los Angeles Times describes many cases where teachers are being “fired or suspended for perfectly lawful activities during off-work hours when those activities are deemed inappropriate by parents or school officials." Some teachers were blogging about students, sending explicit text messages to their partner, holding alcoholic beverages in their hands in photos on Facebook or just caught in the background of a suggestive picture. At the end of the work day these teachers should be able to go back home and live their own life and do as they please. As long as they are not harming anyone, why should they be fired for what they do in their free time? Any other employee of another company, say for example Sobeys, would end their day at the end of their shift and not have to worry about complying to anyone’s rules, except the law, of course. Why should expect our teachers to always have their behavior in check and always be on the clock?



One teacher, who was fired for a picture of her holding a beer in her hands while on vacation in Europe was uploaded to Facebook, is currently being fighting back and demanding her job back. Her profile was set to private, and yet, someone managed to see her pictures and told the principle. I understand we think of our teachers as role models but realistically, children learn from everyone in their environment. So why should a teacher be fired over a photo of them having a beer, when that student could quite possibly witness their own parents drinking one or two every single night? We can’t say “Don’t drink, you are underage, it’s wrong” and then get mad a teacher uploads a picture to Facebook (that the student might not have even saw), when they are witnessing it everywhere they look: at home, on TV, in magazines, music videos and movies.
This reminded me of the performed ethnography we did in class, and one of the characters named Rahima Ali, a muslim woman, held the personal belief that homosexuality is wrong, but did not show it at school. Being in that sort of environment, she had to take care to respect the orientation of all people in the school, but outside of school, she is rightly allowed to hold whatever views she wants. It also reminded me of Deacon’s article and how one of the three Foucauldian themes of the ‘techno-political’ history of the school was ‘moral orthopedics’ – that schools are supposed to create the moral ‘skeleton’ for us growing up and should be something that teaches us right from wrong and good from bad. Teachers are supposed to teach students the curriculum, but are also teaching them morality and ethics in addition, through saying ‘Yes, you can do that, that is good’ or ‘No, you may not do that, you are not old enough, it is bad if you do that now.’ Teachers help teach the morals students have growing up, but they shouldn’t have to hold back from having a beer or two or going to a bachelor/bachelorette party that may have strippers simply because they tell the students not to. The big difference is, these kids are young, and underage, while a teacher is in their late 20’s and older. They shouldn’t have to restrain themselves. I understand the point that, well maybe they shouldn’t put the images on Facebook, but what if they do not even know the pictures are there in the first place? A teacher was suspended for a month, without pay, simply because she was at a party and a male stripper was there and she as caught in the background of a picture that was uploaded, without her knowledge. So, even if they don’t have a Facebook account or knowingly upload these pictures, a teacher can still get suspended for simply being at a party. How is this fair?
I guess the point I am trying to make is that, yes we should be telling students it is wrong to do certain things because they are underage, but these teachers are not underage and these actions are perfectly legal. Why should they be getting disciplined for doing something that, if any other type of employee at any other company would do, would just simply be ignored or overlooked, just because they are teachers? A balance can be found; a balance between teaching children, but being able to live your own life, without worrying about losing a job because you had a beer on vacation and wanted to show your family and friends via Facebook.



I am not sure if anyone else find this topic as interesting as I do, but I looked into more news articles about this and I found some more if you are interested. I will list them below:

Images obtained from:

5 comments:

  1. This is a really great article, I had wrote one about filipino students who were not allowed to graduate due to similar circumstances. I understand your point about letting the teachers do what they want on their own time (after their job of course). As adults we make many decisions, some decisions better than others. As for the teacher who was caught in the background of a party with a stripper, it is unfortunate but she made the choice to goto that party. Whenever someone makes a bad decision they are reprimanded. teachers should be able to do what they want, but need to take more precautions. It's not fair to be fired from a job from what you do outside of work, but as a teacher you take an imaginary oath that says you will put the students ahead of yourself.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I disagree with the above comment in some ways. Sure I teacher is supposed to act respectably and consider the fall out of their decisions but by taking so many percautions the teacher may be missing out on new opportunities. Yes they take an imagionary oath saying that they will put the students ahead of themselves but to what extent should they take this seriously? It just seems to contradict itself saying that teaches can have a life, as long as they put the students first.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for reading and commenting. This topic is a touchy subject and that's part of the reason why I wanted to bring it up. I think part of the reason it is challenging to come to some sort of solid answer about what is appropriate and what isn't outside of school is because each scenario given is different. We hold differing opinions on this topic, and I just want to say thanks for giving your input.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think teachers will always be held to unrealistic expectations. There was once a time when female teachers were all spinsters who dedicated their lives to looking respectable and living a moral life or they would be fired. We're at a much more relaxed place but I think we should look at teacher's standards in the past before getting into an uproar. Moral panics are normal considering any interactions with children. Parents will always want the most 'moral' of persons teaching their children, in school and outside of school as well. The school board will go to many lengths to keep parents happy as we can see in this article above.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks for reading and commenting, you make a great point about how things have changed from the past, but the schoolboards still will, and do, go to great lengths to keep the parents of their children happy. I would want the same for my kids, I guess teachers just needs to be wise about whether or not their activities end up on social media, but I don't think they should be fired for texting their boyfriend or girlfriend. It's kind of hard to draw the line in the sand about what it premissible and what isn't.

    ReplyDelete